» Arizona Cases, Arizona Statutes, Procedural Rules » Arizona's Unusual Statute of Limitations
Arizona's Unusual Statute of Limitations
September 8th, 2008 | Add a Comment
Although Arizona courts have on multiple occasions explained that statutes of limitations are to be construed liberally in favor of the accused and against the prosecution, in practice, that doesn’t make an awful lot of difference. According to at least one Arizona court, our criminal statute of limitations is explicit. Unlike most states’ statutes of limitations, which begin running at the time of the offense, it doesn’t begin to run until the state actually discovers or should have discovered the offense.
The law allows some serious injustice to take place as long as it isn’t the state’s fault. A victim can wait as long as he or she pleases before going to authorities, and as long as there’s no reason the state should have known earlier, charges can go forward. What would stop a victim from waiting until key defense witnesses die before coming forward? Why not wait until the defendant has more to lose and is likely to take a plea?
Also, why not wait until the defendant has more personal assets? A victim could potentially use Arizona’s criminal statute of limitations to extend the time for filing a civil suit based on the same conduct. While a victim would normally have to file a civil claim in a relatively short window of time after being wronged, a special law extends the civil statute of limitations for one year after the final disposition of a criminal proceeding arising from the same conduct. If a victim misses the civil statute of limitations, why not go to the police and get a criminal case started? The victim will then have a year after that’s done to file a civil suit.
Arizona courts claim statutes of limitations are designed primarily to protect the accused from the burden of defending himself or herself against charges of long completed misconduct. If that really is the purpose, it shouldn’t matter whether the delay is caused by the state or the victim.
Filed under: Arizona Cases, Arizona Statutes, Procedural Rules · Tags: 13-107, civil, criminal, escobar-mendez, plea, seven years, statute of limitations, strategy
Recent Posts
- Online Gambling And Cash Transaction: A Question Of Legality Within The Context Regarding Bangladesh”
- Online Gambling And Cash Transaction: A Question Of Legality Within The Context Regarding Bangladesh”
- 10 Best On The Web Casinos For Real Money January 2025
- Typy Bukmacherskie Typy Dnia, Typy Na Dziś, Typy Na Jutro
- 10 Best On The Web Casinos For Real Money January 2025
Archives
Categories
Blogroll
- A Public Defender
- Crime & Federalism
- Criminal Defense
- Defending People
- DUI Blog
- Gamso – For the Defense
- Koehler Law
- Life at the Harris County Criminal Justice Center
- Military Underdog
- Norm Pattis
- Not Guilty
- People v. State
- Philly Law Blog
- Popehat
- Probable Cause
- Simple Justice
- The Defense Rests
- The Irreverent Lawyer
- Windypundit
Most Commented
Recent Articles
- Online Gambling And Cash Transaction: A Question Of Legality Within The Context Regarding Bangladesh”
- Online Gambling And Cash Transaction: A Question Of Legality Within The Context Regarding Bangladesh”
- 10 Best On The Web Casinos For Real Money January 2025
- Typy Bukmacherskie Typy Dnia, Typy Na Dziś, Typy Na Jutro
- 10 Best On The Web Casinos For Real Money January 2025
- Weave a Web of Comfort – Spider Hoodie Up to 35% Off
Recent Comments